Can future systemic financial risks be quantified? Ergodic vs nonergodic stochastic processes

Vol. 29 No. 4 (2009)

Oct-Dec / 2009
Published October 1, 2009
PDF-English
PDF-English

How to Cite

Davidson, Paul. 2009. “Can Future Systemic Financial Risks Be Quantified? Ergodic Vs Nonergodic Stochastic Processes”. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 29 (4):324-40. https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/500.

Can future systemic financial risks be quantified? Ergodic vs nonergodic stochastic processes

Paul Davidson
Bernard Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis, The New School, New York
Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 29 No. 4 (2009), Oct-Dec / 2009, Pages 324-340

Abstract

Different axioms underlie efficient market theory and Keynes’s liquidity preference theory. Efficient market theory assumes the ergodic axiom. Consequently, today’s decision makers can calculate with actuarial precision the future value of all possible outcomes resulting from today’s decisions. Since in an efficient market world decision makers “know” their intertemporal budget constraints, decision makers never default on a loan, i.e., systemic defaults, insolvencies, and bankruptcies are impossible. Keynes liquidity preference theory rejects the ergodic axiom. The future is ontologically uncertain. Accordingly systemic defaults and insolvencies can occur but can never be predicted in advance.

JEL Classification: G1; D80; E1.


Keywords: ergodic axiom efficient market theory probabilistic risk uncertainty