Who has the most resources to govern? A comparison between states and local governments per capital revenue

Vol. 16 No. 1 (1996)

Jan-Mar / 1996
Published January 1, 1996
PDF-Portuguese (Português (Brasil))
PDF-Portuguese (Português (Brasil))

How to Cite

Rosenblatt, David, and Gil Shildo. 1996. “Who Has the Most Resources to Govern? A Comparison Between States and Local Governments Per Capital Revenue”. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 16 (1):107-13. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31571996-0871.

Who has the most resources to govern? A comparison between states and local governments per capital revenue

David Rosenblatt
Economista do Banco Mundial, Washington, D.C., Estados Unidos.
Gil Shildo
Professor visitante da Universidade de Maryland.
Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 16 No. 1 (1996), Jan-Mar / 1996, Pages 107-113

Abstract

This paper examines differences in per capita revenues across Brazil’s states and
capital municipalities. It provides a theoretical overview of Brazil’s fiscal equalization programs
(the State and Municipal “Participation” Funds). The paper then provides evidence
that these programs are not only failing to meet their equalization objectives, but in addition
they are creating distorted patterns of revenues per capita across states and municipalities:
some economically poor states and municipalities have revenues per capita far above the
national average. This pattern of revenues per capita should be brought to the public’s and
policy makers’ attention so that they may: (i) better evaluate the performance of state and local governments, and (ii) better evaluate proposals for revising Brazil’s system of fiscal
federalism.

JEL Classification: H71; H72; H77.


Keywords: Public expenditure fiscal federalism intergovernmental relations